ACP is better than HPL for most building cladding applications. ACP is lighter (5.5 vs 8-12 kg/sqm), cheaper (₹65-200 vs ₹150-400/sq.ft), offers more design options (500+ vs 200+ shades), installs faster (dry-fix vs mechanical fixing), and provides comparable fire safety with FR A2+ options. HPL's advantage is higher impact resistance at ground level.
| Parameter | ACP | HPL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 5.5 kg/sqm | 8-12 kg/sqm | ACP |
| Cost | ₹65-200/sq.ft | ₹150-400/sq.ft | ACP |
| Shades | 500+ | 200+ | ACP |
| Installation | Fast dry-fix | Mechanical fixing | ACP |
| Lifespan | 25+ years | 15-20 years | ACP |
| Fire Rating | FR A2+ available | B-s1,d0 | Tie |
| Impact Resistance | Moderate | High | HPL |
For 90% of Indian facade projects, ACP offers better value. HPL is suitable only for ground-floor impact zones and specific architectural requirements.
For most building exteriors, ACP is the practical choice over granite. ACP is 8-10x lighter (5.5 vs 40-60 kg/sqm), 3-4x cheaper, installs 3x faster, and VIVA's Natural Stone series replicates granite textures convincingly. Granite's advantage is natural uniqueness and 50+ year lifespan. For high-rise facades, granite's weight makes it impractical above 3-4 floors.
Read full answer →Contact VIVA's technical team for expert guidance on ACP selection.